Author Guidelines
Panunjung Tarung : Student Scientific Journal publishes research results in the field of interdisciplinary environment that have never been published or are being considered for publication in other journals.
Manuscript in the form of 1 column sent to Panunjung Tarung : Student Scientific Journal must follow the Article Writing Guide on this page which can be downloaded in the Template menu
Manuscript Submission
The author must submit the manuscript (English or Indonesian) in the form of a softfile
1. General Overview of the Peer Review Process
Basically, the submitted manuscript will be evaluated by reviewers appointed by the editorial board.
The submitted manuscript will be reviewed for the first time by the Editor-in-Chief for language suitability and conformity with the scope of the journal and writing procedures in accordance with the author's gudiline. If according to the editor the manuscript is worthy of review by a team of reviewers consisting of 1 or 2 people, then the manuscript will be sent to the reviewer, but if the manuscript does not meet the initial criteria, then the manuscript will be returned to the author.
The reviewer team consisting of 2 people will conduct a review using the Blind review process method where the reviewer will not know the author's name in the manuscript. Assessment criteria include originality, significance and writing. The Editorial Board has the authority to accept or reject submitted manuscripts, and ask authors to send back submitted manuscripts. Plagiarism screening of texts submitted to this journal is done with the help of the TURNITIN application. The more plagiarism, the article will be rejected immediately (if more than 30% do not include a bibliography).
2. Spesific Overview of Peer-Review Process
Reviewers will be asked to provide detailed and constructive comments where these comments will be the basis for consideration for editors to reject or accept articles that have been submitted. Some things to note from the reviewer are as follows:
a. Originality and significance
Reviewers are asked to discuss the originality of the submitted findings in an article. In addition, reviewers should look at whether the findings can significantly affect the scientific community. If the reviewer finds the same work as the article being reviewed, the reviewer can provide suggestions or criticisms to improve the way research results are delivered.
b. Novelty of theoretical approach and how to discuss the problem
Reviewers are asked to discuss the novelty of theoretical approaches and the author's way of discussing research results to solve problems. This element of novelty can usually be seen in the introduction as an introduction to the urgency of the research that has been done.
c. Strengths and weaknesses of the methods used
Reviewers are expected to assess the methods used. Statistical analysis or other methods of analysis that influence the interpretation of results should be criticized in order to improve the quality of the article being reviewed.
d. Reliability of the appearance of research results and conclusions
Reviewers are expected to be able to assess the reliability of research results and conclusions obtained. This reliability can be assessed through the completeness of the analysis and data that has been obtained.
e. Layout alignment with guidelines
Alignment with the guidelines will make it easier for editors to carry out the editing and lay-out process. Many writers often overlook this and simply format their writing incompletely and perfectly according to the guidelines given. Reviewers can judge this but the main focus is on the content and some previous points.
f. Suggestions and feedback
When some errors or shortcomings are found from an article, the reviewer is expected to be able to show clearly, which parts should be improved and what needs to be done to improve the quality of the article.
The bibliography is arranged alphabetically without numbering and the distance between the bibliography is 1.5 spaces with writing the bibliography using the APA Style format
How to refer to the list of references is done by writing the name of the first author and the year of publication in parentheses, for example (Ohara et al., 1996)
Tables and figures should be numbered sequentially in the order in which they appear. Each figure and table needs to be given a short description placed at the bottom of the figure or table.
Maximum image size not exceeding 15 X 20 cm
Address
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Kuala Kapuas Jalan Tambun Bungai No. 56 Kelurahan Selat Tengah, District Selat Kabupaten Kapuas Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check their submissions are compliant with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors who do not comply with these guidelines.
The submission has never been published before, nor before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been given in the Comments to the Editor).
The response file is in Microsoft Word document file format.
If available, a URL for reference has been provided.
The abstract text stays while the body text is 1.5., single coloumn format; uses Times New Roman font, 12 point font; uses italics for English terms.
The text complies with the style and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Downloadable authoring template in the Menu section.
Privacy Policy
Names and email addresses entered in this journal website will be used exclusively for the purposes of this journal and will not be available for other purposes or other parties.
Author Fees
The journal charges the following author fees.
Article Publication: 100.000,00 (IDR) If the paper is accepted for publication, you will be required to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover the publication fee.
